<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.newrules.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
<channel>
 <title>Energy Articles and Commentaries</title>
 <link>http://www.newrules.org/articles</link>
 <description>New Rules Project Commentaries and Articles</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Utility Fights Dirty in City&#039;s Battle for Clean Local Energy</title>
 <link>http://www.newrules.org/energy/article/utility-fights-dirty-citys-battle-clean-local-energy</link>
 <description>&lt;p class=&quot;p1&quot;&gt;
In&lt;br /&gt;
just three weeks, citizens of Boulder, CO, will vote on  whether to&lt;br /&gt;
begin a big, formal process to unplug from Xcel Energy’s  system and&lt;br /&gt;
plug into local energy self-reliance.  The vote to form a  municipal&lt;br /&gt;
electric utility could set a precedent for communities across  the&lt;br /&gt;
United States to keep millions of dollars local instead of sending  them&lt;br /&gt;
to remote electric utilities each year.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;p3&quot;&gt;
At every turn, the utility has stalled local efforts.   
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newrules.org/energy/article/utility-fights-dirty-citys-battle-clean-local-energy&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.newrules.org/energy/article/utility-fights-dirty-citys-battle-clean-local-energy#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 16:23:37 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jfarrell</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3184 at http://www.newrules.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Local Solar Power is Best (Infographic)</title>
 <link>http://www.newrules.org/energy/article/local-solar-power-best-infographic</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;img src=&quot;/sites/newrules.org/files/u1/solar-info_.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; hspace=&quot;4&quot; vspace=&quot;4&quot; width=&quot;142&quot; height=&quot;200&quot; align=&quot;left&quot; /&gt;Local solar power hits the sweet spot of cost-effectiveness and economic value for communities.  The best approach for expanding energy is local mid-size projects.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
 Click through to see our new infographic, illustrating the optimal size for solar, it’s out-sized impact in generating power, and the enormous economic benefits of local solar power.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newrules.org/energy/article/local-solar-power-best-infographic&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.newrules.org/energy/article/local-solar-power-best-infographic#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 14:28:27 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jfarrell</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3180 at http://www.newrules.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>About ILSR&#039;s Energy Work</title>
 <link>http://www.newrules.org/energy/article/about-ilsrs-energy-work</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
If you&#039;ve ever wondered how to explain to someone what ILSR brings to renewable energy policy, look no further.  This 16-slide presentation lays out our history, philosophy and out-sized impact fighting for greater local authority and economic returns from renewable energy:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newrules.org/energy/article/about-ilsrs-energy-work&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.newrules.org/energy/article/about-ilsrs-energy-work#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 15:23:33 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jfarrell</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3168 at http://www.newrules.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Could California Save 30% or More on Solar With German Policy?</title>
 <link>http://www.newrules.org/energy/article/could-california-save-30-or-more-solar-german-policy</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
The Golden State has covered over 50,000 roofs with solar  PV in the past decade, but could it also save 30% or more on its current solar  costs?  It turns out switching energy policies could save ratepayers billions.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
If 2011 is a banner year and the state sees 1 gigawatt (GW) of installed capacity, the savings to ratepayers of a CLEAN program (over 20 years) would be nearly $3 billion.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newrules.org/energy/article/could-california-save-30-or-more-solar-german-policy&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.newrules.org/energy/article/could-california-save-30-or-more-solar-german-policy#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 13:59:02 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jfarrell</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3165 at http://www.newrules.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>How Community Ownership Can Save Wind Power </title>
 <link>http://www.newrules.org/energy/article/how-community-ownership-can-save-wind-power</link>
 <description>&lt;div&gt;Wind power has expanded rapidly in recent years, but the new wind farms have a common characteristic: absentee ownership. These large wind farms promise a broad expansion of clean energy production, but not a commensurate expansion in local economic benefits.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;Without a say or stake in the turbines remaking their local skyline, communities have raised red flags. The result is more restrictive wind siting policies and opposition to new high-voltage transmission lines that may carry wind power from remote areas to major cities.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;There’s an alternative.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newrules.org/energy/article/how-community-ownership-can-save-wind-power&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.newrules.org/energy/article/how-community-ownership-can-save-wind-power#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 13:41:33 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3136 at http://www.newrules.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Europe Leads on Decentralized Renewables, but Lags on Effective Building Retrofits </title>
 <link>http://www.newrules.org/energy/article/europe-leads-decentralized-renewables-lags-effective-building-retrofits</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Decentralized renewable energy doesn’t top the climate and energy 
agenda in Europe or the United States, but for very different reasons. 
In Europe, there has already been substantial development of 
decentralized renewable energy, and policy makers have moved on to 
discussions of 100% renewable energy. In the United States, by contrast,
well-heeled interest groups tend to dominate renewable energy 
discourse, and American energy policy reflects their paradigm of 
centralized generation dependent on high-voltage transmission lines. 
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newrules.org/energy/article/europe-leads-decentralized-renewables-lags-effective-building-retrofits&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.newrules.org/energy/article/europe-leads-decentralized-renewables-lags-effective-building-retrofits#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 15:00:18 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jfarrell</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3063 at http://www.newrules.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Lenders Have it Wrong and PACE Advocates Should Fight Back</title>
 <link>http://www.newrules.org/energy/article/lenders-have-it-wrong-and-pace-advocates-should-fight-back</link>
 <description>The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) issued guidance yesterday that drew a line in the sand 
against municipal energy financing, a.k.a. Property Assessed Clean 
Energy (PACE) programs.  These innovative initiatives provide energy 
efficiency retrofits for homeowners that are repaid through a property 
tax assessment.  Since homeowners falling behind on payments must repay 
their PACE assessment before their mortgage, giant lenders Fannie Mae 
and Freddie Mac will consider participating households in default on 
their mortgages for receiving an energy efficiency retrofit via PACE.  Their rationale is paper thin.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newrules.org/energy/article/lenders-have-it-wrong-and-pace-advocates-should-fight-back&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.newrules.org/energy/article/lenders-have-it-wrong-and-pace-advocates-should-fight-back#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.newrules.org/category/keywords/oped">Op-Ed</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 07:31:09 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jfarrell</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3044 at http://www.newrules.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) makes partners of solar PV and energy efficiency</title>
 <link>http://www.newrules.org/energy/article/property-assessed-clean-energy-pace-makes-partners-solar-pv-and-energy-efficiency</link>
 <description>Property assessed clean energy (PACE) does not make energy efficiency 
the enemy of solar PV.  Instead, it helps optimize the use of solar PV 
for participating property owners so that an optimally sized solar PV array that is partially 
paid for through the energy savings from efficiency improvements. &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newrules.org/energy/article/property-assessed-clean-energy-pace-makes-partners-solar-pv-and-energy-efficiency&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.newrules.org/energy/article/property-assessed-clean-energy-pace-makes-partners-solar-pv-and-energy-efficiency#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.newrules.org/category/keywords/oped">Op-Ed</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:30:50 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jfarrell</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2989 at http://www.newrules.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The State of the States: Power From the People</title>
 <link>http://www.newrules.org/energy/article/state-states-power-people</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;In the absence of federal action, states are leading the way toward renewable energy, reducing greenhouse gas emissions, and empowering local communities to be more energy self-reliant.  This presentation to the Environmental Grantmakers Association highlights the model policies for moving forward.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newrules.org/energy/article/state-states-power-people&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.newrules.org/energy/article/state-states-power-people#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 13:55:09 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jfarrell</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2972 at http://www.newrules.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Instead of Cap and Trade, Cap and Dividend</title>
 <link>http://www.newrules.org/energy/article/instead-cap-and-trade-cap-and-dividend</link>
 <description>A new and vastly improved climate change policy has come out of nowhere
to capture the imagination of state and national policymakers: &amp;quot;Cap and
dividend.&amp;quot; It works like this: Step one, impose a carbon cap. Step two,
auction off all carbon allowances. Step three, return most of (if not all) the revenues
generated to all households on a per capita basis.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newrules.org/energy/article/instead-cap-and-trade-cap-and-dividend&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.newrules.org/energy/article/instead-cap-and-trade-cap-and-dividend#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.newrules.org/category/keywords/oped">Op-Ed</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 10:56:50 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>dmorris</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2947 at http://www.newrules.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

