<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.newrules.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
<channel>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://www.newrules.org/general</link>
 <description>Latest news, commentaries, and audio</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Eastern States Resist Paying for Delivery of Midwest Wind Power</title>
 <link>http://www.newrules.org/energy/news/eastern-states-resist-paying-delivery-midwest-wind-power</link>
 <description>A coalition of utilities have announced their
opposition to a series of 765-kilovolt transmission lines, more than double the
capacity of the current 345-kilovolt lines. The lines are proposed as a way to send
electricity from the Dakotas, Iowa and Minnesota to Chicago and points
east. &amp;quot;If Iowa wants to build a transmission line for their energy, we have
no objection. But Iowa or the Midwest should pay for it,&amp;quot; said Ian
Bowles, secretary of energy and environmental affairs in Massachusetts. 
New England states want to produce their own wind energy from offshore
farms.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newrules.org/energy/news/eastern-states-resist-paying-delivery-midwest-wind-power&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.newrules.org/energy/news/eastern-states-resist-paying-delivery-midwest-wind-power#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.newrules.org/category/keywords/local-selfreliance-news">New Rules News</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:43:29 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jbailey</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2968 at http://www.newrules.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>New Wind Data Finds a Windier, More Self-Reliant Midwest</title>
 <link>http://www.newrules.org/energy/news/new-wind-data-finds-windier-more-selfreliant-midwest</link>
 <description>Five Midwest states (Missouri, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan and Ohio) could get nearly all their electricity from wind, according to updated maps from the Institute for Local Self-Reliance (ILSR). New data from Wind Powering America mean that 32 states could get all of their electricity from in-state resources, even more than initially revealed in ILSR&#039;s ground-breaking report last fall, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newrules.org/energy/publications/energy-selfreliant-states-second-and-expanded-edition&quot;&gt;Energy Self-Reliant States&lt;/a&gt;. The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.windpoweringamerica.gov/filter_detail.asp?itemid=2542&quot;&gt;revised estimates&lt;/a&gt; come from the National Renewable Energy Lab&#039;s Wind Powering America project and are the first nationwide update since the early 1990s.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newrules.org/energy/news/new-wind-data-finds-windier-more-selfreliant-midwest&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.newrules.org/energy/news/new-wind-data-finds-windier-more-selfreliant-midwest#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.newrules.org/category/keywords/press-release">Press Release</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 07:48:25 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jfarrell</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2965 at http://www.newrules.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>John Farrell Explains the Benefits of Decentralized Energy on KBOO</title>
 <link>http://www.newrules.org/energy/news/john-farrell-explains-benefits-decentralized-energy-kboo</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
The Obama administration&#039;s energy policy jumps the shark: why nuclear is
a bad deal and carbon-captured coal is anything but clean.  Senior 
Research John Farrell discusses this and the smarter strategy of a 
decentralized renewable energy future with KBOO host Bill Resnick.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The rules we make now will decide our energy future.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kboo.org/node/19597&quot;&gt;Listen to the interview here&lt;/a&gt;. 
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newrules.org/energy/news/john-farrell-explains-benefits-decentralized-energy-kboo&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.newrules.org/energy/news/john-farrell-explains-benefits-decentralized-energy-kboo#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.newrules.org/category/keywords/audio">Audio</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 11:36:07 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2961 at http://www.newrules.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Britain Moves Feed-in Tariffs to a Whole New Level</title>
 <link>http://www.newrules.org/energy/news/britain-moves-feedin-tariffs-whole-new-level</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
In a truly groundbreaking move for the English-speaking world,
Britain&#039;s Department of Energy &amp;amp; Climate Change (DECC) has released
a full suite of renewable energy tariffs that go into effect in April.  Britain will become the first country in the world to offer a
comprehensive system of tariffs for renewable heat, including tariffs
for solar domestic hot water and ground-source heat pumps among others.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newrules.org/energy/news/britain-moves-feedin-tariffs-whole-new-level&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.newrules.org/energy/news/britain-moves-feedin-tariffs-whole-new-level#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.newrules.org/category/keywords/local-selfreliance-news">New Rules News</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 13:16:23 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2954 at http://www.newrules.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Instead of Cap and Trade, Cap and Dividend</title>
 <link>http://www.newrules.org/energy/article/instead-cap-and-trade-cap-and-dividend</link>
 <description>A new and vastly improved climate change policy has come out of nowhere
to capture the imagination of state and national policymakers: &amp;quot;Cap and
dividend.&amp;quot; It works like this: Step one, impose a carbon cap. Step two,
auction off all carbon allowances. Step three, return most of (if not all) the revenues
generated to all households on a per capita basis.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newrules.org/energy/article/instead-cap-and-trade-cap-and-dividend&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.newrules.org/energy/article/instead-cap-and-trade-cap-and-dividend#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.newrules.org/category/keywords/oped">Op-Ed</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 10:56:50 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>dmorris</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2947 at http://www.newrules.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Supreme Court Removes Clean Energy Policy Detour</title>
 <link>http://www.newrules.org/energy/article/supreme-court-removes-clean-energy-policy-detour</link>
 <description>In a largely unheralded move last week, the Supreme Court removed an 
unnecessary and unpopular detour from the road to a clean energy 
economy, preserving the right of states to refuse new high voltage transmission lines.   
At issue was the right of the federal government to override a state’s
veto of a new transmission line.  Electric utilities had appealed the
Piedmont Environmental Council’s victory in a lower court decision, but
the high court’s refusal to review means that states will retain the
authority to refuse new high voltage transmission lines.  &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newrules.org/energy/article/supreme-court-removes-clean-energy-policy-detour&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.newrules.org/energy/article/supreme-court-removes-clean-energy-policy-detour#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 09:46:47 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jfarrell</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2945 at http://www.newrules.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>A New Outside-the-Beltway Climate Bill Deserves Support; Why Won&#039;t Enviros Get Behind It?</title>
 <link>http://www.newrules.org/energy/article/new-outsidethebeltway-climate-bill-deserves-support-why-wont-enviros-get-behind-it</link>
 <description>Cap and Trade is one approach for limiting our global warming pollution but there is a different climate change proposal in Congress called the CLEAR Act. It&#039;s simple, deserves to be looked at closely and looks to be the start of a winning alternative to the complicated system of cap and trade.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newrules.org/energy/article/new-outsidethebeltway-climate-bill-deserves-support-why-wont-enviros-get-behind-it&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.newrules.org/energy/article/new-outsidethebeltway-climate-bill-deserves-support-why-wont-enviros-get-behind-it#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.newrules.org/category/keywords/energy/electricity">Electricity</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 14:51:34 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>dmorris</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2934 at http://www.newrules.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>On Energy Questions, State&#039;s Leaders Should Listen Better</title>
 <link>http://www.newrules.org/energy/article/energy-questions-states-leaders-should-listen-better</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
How many times do the people have to be proven right before their
political leaders listen to them? The recent cancellation of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bigstoneii.com/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; class=&quot;inline_link_external&quot;&gt;Big Stone II&lt;/a&gt; by its investors brings that question to mind.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Back in 2006, seven Minnesota utilities asked the South Dakota Public
Utilities Commission for permission to build a large coal fired power
plant in that state. At the same time they asked the Minnesota Public
Utilities Commission for permission to build a high voltage
transmission line to bring that plant&#039;s electricity into Minnesota,
where more than half of its output would be consumed.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newrules.org/energy/article/energy-questions-states-leaders-should-listen-better&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.newrules.org/energy/article/energy-questions-states-leaders-should-listen-better#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.newrules.org/category/keywords/oped">Op-Ed</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:28:46 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>dmorris</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2922 at http://www.newrules.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>President’s Smart Grid Grants are not a Transmission Superhighway, Thankfully</title>
 <link>http://www.newrules.org/energy/news/president-s-smart-grid-grants-are-not-transmission-superhighway-thankfully</link>
 <description>There’s good news and bad news in President Obama’s announcement
Wednesday of 100 grants totaling $3.4 billion to build a smarter
electric grid.  The good news is the grants. The bad news is that President Obama continues to conflate the need for
a smart grid with the need for a new national high voltage grid.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newrules.org/energy/news/president-s-smart-grid-grants-are-not-transmission-superhighway-thankfully&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.newrules.org/energy/news/president-s-smart-grid-grants-are-not-transmission-superhighway-thankfully#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.newrules.org/category/keywords/press-release">Press Release</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:59:33 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jfarrell</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2920 at http://www.newrules.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>A little heresy on transmission</title>
 <link>http://www.newrules.org/energy/article/little-heresy-transmission</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
The last thing renewable energy needs right now
are new transmission lines.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
This statement is heresy in the green
community, but there’s a danger that the increasing focus of green energy
advocates on a new nationwide transmission superhighway may undermine the
pursuit of near-term renewable energy goals.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newrules.org/energy/article/little-heresy-transmission&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.newrules.org/energy/article/little-heresy-transmission#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.newrules.org/category/keywords/oped">Op-Ed</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 20:15:55 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jfarrell</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2917 at http://www.newrules.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
