Mercury Pollution

Mercury is a neurotoxin that accumulates in the food chain and can damage the brain, spinal cord, kidneys and liver. It has been linked to attention deficit disorder in children, and is particularly hazardous to developing fetuses and young children. Poison control centers and emergency rooms took 18,000 calls in 1998 because of broken mercury fever thermometers.

Fish consumption advisories exist in 40 states due to mercury contamination. Broken thermometers, which each contain one-half gram of the substance, are a big source of the pollution. That half gram is sufficient to spoil the water in 200 Olympic-sized pools, or 5 million gallons. There are better alternatives to poisonous mercury thermometers, such as digital and glass with alcohol or galinstan.

Mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants lead to contamination of our nation's waterways. Fish eating advisories are in place in many states that recommended a limited consumption of fish from certain waterways. New technologies are making mercury emissions control more economical.

Several agencies and local governments have taken steps to phase out mercury thermometers. In 1998, the American Hospital Association signed an agreement with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency promising to phase out the use of mercury thermometers among its members.

More Information:

Rules

Mercury Reduction from Coal Plants, IL

  • State
  • On January 5, 2006, Illinois Governor Blagojevich proposed a strong set of mercury pollution control standards. The proposal would require coal plant owners to install modern pollution control equipment to reduce mercury pollution by 90 percent or more by June 30, 2009.  Unlike other state mercury reduction efforts that involved some sort of legislative catalyst, the Illinois effort appears to be an executive directive from the Governor to the Illinois Pollution Control Board (PCB) to establish agressive mercury reduction rules for power plants. More

    Mercury Reduction from Coal Plants, MN

  • State
  • Under a compromise agreement, legislation was passed into law in May 2006 that requires Minnesota's largest coal-fired power plants to cut mercury emissions by 90 percent by 2015.  Utilities were brought on board by allowing immediate recovery from ratepayers the cost of installing the necessary pollution control equipment. More

    Mercury Reduction from Coal Plants, CT

  • State
  • In March 2003, environmental organizations including Clean Water Action, the Connecticut Coalition for Clean Air, and the Clean Air Task Force along with electric utility PSEG Power Connecticut (owner of the 375-megawatt Bridgeport Harbor coal-fired power plant) issued a joint recommendation to the Connecticut General Assembly for legislation establishing stringent new mercury emission standards for the state's coal-fired power plants. The legislation sets a national precedent for controlling power plant mercury emissions. More

    Multiple Pollutant Reduction Program - NH

  • State
  • In May 2002, New Hampshire became the first state in the country to adopt rules to regulate carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from power plants. The new law establishes a multiple pollutant reduction program. In addition to CO2, the final version of the new law (HB284, NH Laws of 2002, Chapter 130) establishes caps on emissions of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides by existing fossil fuel electric power plants and also requires a reduction in mercury pollution. This law permits the banking and trading of emissions reductions credits to achieve compliance with the caps. The NH Department of Environmental Services is directed to establish an integrated strategy to reduce emissions, including the use of energy efficiency and renewable energy. The new law went into effect July 1, 2002. More

    Comments

    The New Rules Project exists to encourage policies that will increase the political and economic power of citizens and communities. Newrules.org will only approve comments that are relevant and, in our judgment, add a valuable contribution to the topic. We may edit comments to bring out key points. Abusive comments will not be tolerated.

    Mercury from CF Lightbulbs worse than thermometers?

    If you promote banning thermometers, common sense tells me that you would vigorously oppose the compact fluorescent lightbulb? The threat of mercury pollution due to disposal issues and normal breakage seems greater. Why not?

    ----------------

    NEW RULES PROJECT RESPONSE: The amount of mercury in a single thermometer is often more than 100 times the amount in a CFLs.  Having said that, we should be striving to move towards agressive recovery of mercury in bulbs and towards mercury free lighting sources.  The experts in this area are the Mercury Policy Project (www.mercurypolicyproject.org). In a 2008 report, MPP concludes:

    "...sensitive populations should take extra precautions to reduce risks associated with breakage, but says that CFLs generally can and should still be used in everyone’s homes until a nontoxic light bulb becomes available. The report also recommends the adoption of more comprehensive environmental and human health guidelines by decision makers that, in addition to energy-efficiency, address other concerns, including:

    • Reduced toxicity while maintaining performance;
    • Improved breakage resistance and longer lamp life (which can reduce manufacturing, transportation and disposal impacts);
    • Sustainable manufacturing processes (such as the use of encapsulated mercury-dosing technologies);
    • Responsible end-of-life management (particularly through producer responsibility in funding lamp collection and retailer collection programs)
    • Innovative technologies such as light-emitting diodes (LEDs) that use less- or non-toxic materials, that have significantly longer life, are much more efficient for certain applications, and/or that offer other measurable environmental benefits."

    Post new comment

    The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
    Syndicate content