New Rules home
Agriculture
Electricity
Environment
Equity
Finance
Governance
Information
Retail
Taxation

National Voting Rights Institute

Project Vote Smart

State PIRGs' Democracy Campaigns

The Reform Institute for Campaign and Election Issues

Issues and Legal Precedent in State Campaign Finance Reform - Reclaim Democracy, November 2002

Primer on the current rules governing campaign finance at the federal and state levels

Public Citizen's Campaign Finance Reform and Governmental Ethics Program

Campaign Finance Information Center - a resource provided by the Investigative Reporters and Editors Inc.

Opensecrets.org - tracking money in politics by the Center for Responsive Politics

Plugging In the Public: A Model for Campaign Finance Disclosure - by Elizabeth Hedlund and Lisa Rosenberg, 1996

Federal Election Commission's Campaign Finance Law Resources


The New Rules Project - Designing Rules As If Community Matters

Campaign Finance Reform - Clean Election Laws

As of 2008, five states have passed "clean election" laws, laws that provide public money for state election campaigns if a candidate agrees to strict spending limits.

Maine was the first state to enact such a law, by voter referendum, in 1996.

In June 1997, Vermont became the first state to pass a bill modeled after the Maine law through its legislature. Both laws served as models for the clean election initiatives passed by Arizona and Massachusetts voters in November, 1998. The Massachusetts law, however, was repealed by the legislature in 2003. Connecticut's legislature passed a clean election bill in 2005, and it was amended in 2006 to remove an unnecessary step for third party candidates.

New Mexico expanded the program to include candidates for judgeships on the Court of Appeals and Supreme Court of New Mexico in 2007.

New Jersey's legislature passed a clean elections pilot project in 2004, which put into place two legislative districts for the November 2005 election. Following its success, three more districts have been selected to be part of the 2007 Fair and Clean Elections Pilot Project.

RULES:

  • Arizona
    In Arizona, candidates who agree to accept very low amounts of private money receive a fixed and limited amount of public funds. A five-member, non-partisan election commission with authority to enforce election laws administers the system. The law also provides matching funds up to three times the original campaign allocation for Clean Money candidates who are outspent by non-participating opponents or targeted by independent expenditures. More...
  • Connecticut
    State legislature candidates who acquire enough small contributions can choose to have his or her campaign publicly financed. The Clean Elections program also provides finances for primary elections and additional grants for candidates being outspent by non-participating candidates. The program will be expanded to include all statewide elections in 2010. More...
  • Maine
    Maine's campaign finance law, known as the Clean Elections Act is different from those in other states because those who agree to accept public funding must forego any private contributions beyond a small amount of "seed money" and a number of $5 qualifying contributions. More...
  • Massachusetts Clean Election Rules
    Candidates who agree to spending limits qualify for a set amount of clean money (public financing) for their campaign. To qualify, candidates must raise a large number of $100 contributions from in-state residents. The initiative also closes the soft money loophole. More..
  • North Carolina
    Judicial campaigns are the subject of North Carolina's law, enacted by the legislature in 2002. More...
  • Vermont
    The Vermont clean election law offers a public financing option to candidates running for governor and lieutenant governor in the year 2000, and commissions a study to consider extending the option to other state offices after the 2000 elections. The legislation provides a fixed amount of Clean Money to qualifying gubernatorial candidates. In 2006, the Vermont law was ruled unconstitutional. More...
  • Model Clean Election Rule - by Public Campaign
    This organization is dedicated to helping enact sweeping campaign finance reform and reduce the role of special interest money in elections. This is there model rule for clean election reform. More...

RELATED RULE

  • Clean Elections - Voting Equipment
    With the controversial Presidential election of 2000, many communities were compelled to re-examine their voting equipment and consider alternatives. In addition the Federal government passed legislation in 2002 (Help America Vote Act) that created standards for voting equipment and funding to states to make the switch. In the rush to pass this new law some key elements were left out, such as a voter verifiable paper receipt. In 2003, a bill (Voter Confidence and Increased Accessibility Act of 2003) has been introduced in hopes to update the original HAVA Act with specific solutions to the question of voter verified paper receipts and other discrepancies. More...
Search the site


What's New - by date

Local Rules

Banning Water Withdrawal by Corporations

Campaign Finance Reform

Regional Governance

Initiative and Referendum

Proportional Representation

Town Meetings

Unified Development Budgets

Civil Rights Protection

Municipal Employee Residency Requirements

Devolution and Preemption

Privatization Procedures

Anti-Piracy Ordinances

Corporate Accountability

Purchasing Preferences

State Rules

Campaign Finance Reform

Initiative and Referendum

Proportional Representation

Unified Development Budgets

Civil Rights Protection

In-State Processing Requirements

Devolution and Preemption

Anti-Piracy Ordinances

Corporate Accountability

Purchasing Preferences

Federal Rules

Campaign Finance Reform

Corporate Accountability