<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.newrules.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
<channel>
 <title>Information Articles and Commentaries</title>
 <link>http://www.newrules.org/articles</link>
 <description>New Rules Project Commentaries and Articles</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Why Is Mighty Time Warner Cable Scared Of Tiny Salisbury, NC? </title>
 <link>http://www.newrules.org/information/article/why-mighty-time-warner-cable-scared-tiny-salisbury-nc</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
People hate their telecommunications companies.  The poster child for poor customer service in the public sector may be the Department of Motor Vehicle Bureau, but its unresponsiveness and arrogance pales into insignificance to those of Time Warner Cable, Comcast, and AT&amp;amp;T. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
In this article, David Morris and Christopher Mitchell discuss why public ownership beats private in broadband -- which is why the big companies are trying to outlaw it.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newrules.org/information/article/why-mighty-time-warner-cable-scared-tiny-salisbury-nc&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.newrules.org/information/article/why-mighty-time-warner-cable-scared-tiny-salisbury-nc#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 13:26:49 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3144 at http://www.newrules.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Whose Internet? NC Communities Should Defend Freedom to Build Networks</title>
 <link>http://www.newrules.org/information/article/whose-internet-nc-communities-should-defend-freedom-build-networks</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Who should decide the future of broadband access in towns across North Carolina? Citizens and businesses in towns across the state, or a handful of large cable and phone companies? The new General Assembly will almost certainly be asked to address that question.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;With the fastest and most affordable networks in North Carolina being owned by the public, the answer is obvious. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newrules.org/information/article/whose-internet-nc-communities-should-defend-freedom-build-networks&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.newrules.org/information/article/whose-internet-nc-communities-should-defend-freedom-build-networks#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.newrules.org/category/keywords/oped">Op-Ed</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:19:40 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3098 at http://www.newrules.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The First Internet: The Post Office and the Public Interest</title>
 <link>http://www.newrules.org/information/article/first-internet-post-office-and-public-interest</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
In the beginning, there was the post office. Before the Internet, before cable, before TV, before radio, mail delivery was our major means of mass communication. The founders of the United States understood its importance and deemed that it must be a public institution. Article I, Section 8, Clause 7, of the U.S. Constitution states, “Congress shall have Power to establish Post Offices and Post Roads.”
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Congress wanted the U.S. Post Office to be a monopoly, but the Post Office still had to deal with private companies that found loopholes in these rules.  
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newrules.org/information/article/first-internet-post-office-and-public-interest&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.newrules.org/information/article/first-internet-post-office-and-public-interest#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 13:20:32 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>dmorris</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3082 at http://www.newrules.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Cities Take On AT&amp;T, Time Warner and Verizon</title>
 <link>http://www.newrules.org/information/article/cities-take-att-time-warner-and-verizon</link>
 <description>A battle is raging for control of the Internet and it is not taking place in Washington. Scores of cities, fed up with the recalcitrance and outright arrogance of their providers and Washington’s lack of action are taking their information future into their own hands by building their own high-speed networks. To Harold DePriest, head of Chattanooga’s municipally owned fiber network, currently the largest in the country, the issue is clear: “Does our community control our own fate or does someone else control it?”&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newrules.org/information/article/cities-take-att-time-warner-and-verizon&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.newrules.org/information/article/cities-take-att-time-warner-and-verizon#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 09:41:50 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>christopher</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3028 at http://www.newrules.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>In Minnesota, a de facto limit on broadband</title>
 <link>http://www.newrules.org/information/article/minnesota-de-facto-limit-broadband</link>
 <description>The vast majority of Minnesotans, like the rest of the country, are 
served by only two broadband suppliers:  the cable or telephone company.
These companies generally want to maintain their monopolies because 
they can postpone upgrades while keeping prices and profits high.  Just 
about everyone else just wants a better choice among providers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here in Minnesota, Monticello has broken the mold with a smart investment in a publicly owned network.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newrules.org/information/article/minnesota-de-facto-limit-broadband&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.newrules.org/information/article/minnesota-de-facto-limit-broadband#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.newrules.org/category/keywords/press-release">Press Release</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 12:47:51 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>christopher</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2973 at http://www.newrules.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Op-Ed:  Municipal fiber needs more FDR localism, fewer state bans</title>
 <link>http://www.newrules.org/information/article/oped-municipal-fiber-needs-more-fdr-localism-fewer-state-bans</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Community-owned broadband is one way to bring fiber to smaller markets,
but many states restrict the practice. Researcher Christopher Mitchell
argues that it&#039;s time for a bit more Roosevelt-style localism in US
broadband. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Following ILSR&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.muninetworks.org/content/community-broadband-preemption-map&quot;&gt;map showing states that preempt local authority&lt;/a&gt; to build Community Broadband Networks we published the following op-ed on the leading tech site Ars Technica. 
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newrules.org/information/article/oped-municipal-fiber-needs-more-fdr-localism-fewer-state-bans&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.newrules.org/information/article/oped-municipal-fiber-needs-more-fdr-localism-fewer-state-bans#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.newrules.org/category/keywords/oped">Op-Ed</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 11:02:27 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>christopher</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2935 at http://www.newrules.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Maine Needs Publicly Owned Broadband</title>
 <link>http://www.newrules.org/information/article/maine-needs-publicly-owned-broadband</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Current providers won&#039;t encourage the competition necessary to improve service and cut costs.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Last January, as the economy spiraled downward, Time
Warner did what no other company could have gotten away with under the
circumstances: It imposed a price increase of as much as 5.5 percent on
its Maine customers.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Meanwhile, the state&#039;s other major
broadband Internet provider, FairPoint, has amassed a stunning track
record of mismanagement and abysmal customer service.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newrules.org/information/article/maine-needs-publicly-owned-broadband&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.newrules.org/information/article/maine-needs-publicly-owned-broadband#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.newrules.org/category/keywords/oped">Op-Ed</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 09:39:33 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>christopher</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2919 at http://www.newrules.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>West Virginia Gazette: Support Publicly Owned Broadband</title>
 <link>http://www.newrules.org/information/article/west-virginia-gazette-support-publicly-owned-broadband</link>
 <description>Just as railroads and highways were the essential infrastructure for
development in the 19th and 20th centuries, broadband networks will be
essential for 21st-century competitive economies. Small cities and even
isolated, rural communities that have strong educational systems and
human talent will be able to compete in the new global information
economy.
&lt;p&gt;
West Virginia&#039;s beautiful mountains and valleys, coupled with low
density make most of the state an unattractive investment for private
phone and cable companies. Fortunately, no community has to be left
behind, each can seize the future with smart public investments.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
This should not come as a surprise. Local and state governments
built our roads. Thousands of rural communities gained access to
electricity through publicly owned networks.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newrules.org/information/article/west-virginia-gazette-support-publicly-owned-broadband&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.newrules.org/information/article/west-virginia-gazette-support-publicly-owned-broadband#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.newrules.org/category/keywords/oped">Op-Ed</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 09:23:38 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>christopher</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2858 at http://www.newrules.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Fiber opportunity is worth the risk in North St. Paul</title>
 <link>http://www.newrules.org/information/article/fiber-opportunity-worth-risk-north-st-paul</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Come Tuesday, North St. Paul residents have the
opportunity to become the first metro-area community with a
nextgeneration network connecting every home and business. This network
will offer a unique experience in the Twin Cities, an advanced
broadband network similar to what tens of millions use on a daily basis
across the rest of the developed world. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
North St. Paul has asked its citizens to approve $18.5 million
in bonds to build a fiber-to-the-home network called PolarNet. Bonds
will be repaid by the revenue from citizens subscribing to phone,
television, and its blazing fast Internet connection provided by an
established company based in Minnesota.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newrules.org/information/article/fiber-opportunity-worth-risk-north-st-paul&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.newrules.org/information/article/fiber-opportunity-worth-risk-north-st-paul#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.newrules.org/category/keywords/oped">Op-Ed</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 11:31:27 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>christopher</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2623 at http://www.newrules.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Choice -- and a Voice: Broadband Advice for the Obama Administration</title>
 <link>http://www.newrules.org/information/article/choice-and-voice-broadband-advice-obama-administration</link>
 <description>Fiber-to-the-home is essential infrastructure.  Communities know they
need better broadband networks.  DSL is already too slow, especially on
the upload side.  DOCSIS3 cable networks may promise fast speeds this
year and next, but ever increasing numbers of users, each inevitably
increasing bandwidth utilization, will soon overwhelm this legacy
shared architecture.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our international competitors have invested in technologies that will
bring very fast speeds all the way to the home.  In most areas of the
U.S., this can only be achieved with fiber to the home.  And we can
connect a fiber to every home if we make it a priority.  Our geography
gives us a bigger challenge than others, but we are a nation that rises
to challenges.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newrules.org/information/article/choice-and-voice-broadband-advice-obama-administration&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.newrules.org/information/article/choice-and-voice-broadband-advice-obama-administration#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 11:09:51 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>christopher</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2510 at http://www.newrules.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

