By Stacy Mitchell on November 23, 2009
Credit card processing is not only highly concentrated - MasterCard, Visa, and American Express control 93 percent of the market - but competition among the card processors tends to raise, not lower, the fees they charge merchants, according to a new report from the U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO).
The report examines interchange fees - the transaction fees that retailers and other businesses pay each time a customer uses a credit card. These fees are set by Visa and MasterCard, but the money is paid to the bank that issued the card. Therein lies the problem: to grow their market share, Visa and MasterCard "compete for financial institutions to issue their cards" and higher fees "are an incentive to choose to issue one network's card over another."
Interchange fees skyrocketed from $20 billion in 2002 to $45 billion in 2007. "For large credit card banks," notes the GAO, "credit card earnings have been consistently higher than returns for all other commercial bank activities." The top four card issuers - Citigroup, Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase, and Capital One - account for more than 70% of all cards in circulation.
Retailers have almost no ability to counter these fees. Not accepting credit cards is hardly a viable option. Nor can they negotiate effectively with Visa and MasterCard, which dictate rates and terms.
Recognizing the inherent market failure, more than 30 countries regulate interchange fees. The GAO examines several policy approaches.
One approach, taken by a bill currently in Congress, would allow retailers to collectively negotiate with card processors. "Such negotiations could harm small merchants and small issuers, which do not have as much leverage as larger participants and, in some cases, lack the resources to participate in bargaining sessions," the GAO warns.
Another approach, taken by Australia and the European Union, is to set a regulatory cap on interchange fees. Australia set its rate a 0.5%, less than one-quarter of what US merchants pay on average, and recently renewed the policy after a detailed review of its effects.
More: For more on interchange fees and their impact on independent retailers, see our article from earlier this year: "Soaring Credit Card Transaction Fees Squeeze Independent Businesses"
The report examines interchange fees - the transaction fees that retailers and other businesses pay each time a customer uses a credit card. These fees are set by Visa and MasterCard, but the money is paid to the bank that issued the card. Therein lies the problem: to grow their market share, Visa and MasterCard "compete for financial institutions to issue their cards" and higher fees "are an incentive to choose to issue one network's card over another."
Interchange fees skyrocketed from $20 billion in 2002 to $45 billion in 2007. "For large credit card banks," notes the GAO, "credit card earnings have been consistently higher than returns for all other commercial bank activities." The top four card issuers - Citigroup, Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase, and Capital One - account for more than 70% of all cards in circulation.
Retailers have almost no ability to counter these fees. Not accepting credit cards is hardly a viable option. Nor can they negotiate effectively with Visa and MasterCard, which dictate rates and terms.
Recognizing the inherent market failure, more than 30 countries regulate interchange fees. The GAO examines several policy approaches.
One approach, taken by a bill currently in Congress, would allow retailers to collectively negotiate with card processors. "Such negotiations could harm small merchants and small issuers, which do not have as much leverage as larger participants and, in some cases, lack the resources to participate in bargaining sessions," the GAO warns.
Another approach, taken by Australia and the European Union, is to set a regulatory cap on interchange fees. Australia set its rate a 0.5%, less than one-quarter of what US merchants pay on average, and recently renewed the policy after a detailed review of its effects.
More: For more on interchange fees and their impact on independent retailers, see our article from earlier this year: "Soaring Credit Card Transaction Fees Squeeze Independent Businesses"
------
Stacy Mitchell is a senior researcher with the New Rules Project and author of Big-Box Swindle: The True Cost of Mega-Retailers and the Fight for America’s Independent Businesses. Justin Dahlheimer is a reserach associate with the New Rules Project.
------
Sign up for The Hometown Advantage Bulletin to have monthly updates with the latest news and research delivered to your inbox.
Reprint Policy: We generally allow articles to be reprinted
fornon-commercial purposes, provided you attribute the article to the
NewRules Project, include our web address, and do not alter or edit it
inany way. Please contact us for permission to reprint this or other articles.
"Rules" are laws, ordinances, and regulations that can strengthen your community.
Latest Book: Big-Box Swindle
Hometown Advantage Bulletin
This form needs Javascript to display, which your browser doesn't support. Sign up here instead
Regional Rules
Federal Rules
International Rules
Hometown Advantage News Categories
- Antitrust - News on court cases and regulatory actions dealing with the abuse of market power by large retail chains
- Buy Local Campaigns - Read about some of the most effective "buy local" and "local first" campaigns in the country
- Communities Battle Big Boxes - Stories of successful grassroots efforts to block big-box development
- E-Commerce - News on how e-commerce and sales tax policy is affecting independent retailers
- International News - As big-box retailers expand abroad, many countries are adopting policies to control their growth
- Laws and Ordinances - The latest news on innovative state and local policies to limit corporate retailers and strengthen local economies
- Local Business Development - Stories about strategies to develop and expand independent businesses
- Purchasing Cooperatives - Stories that examine how local businesses are banding together to gain strength in numbers and counter the big boxes
- Research: Chains vs. Local Stores - The latest research on the impact of chain retailers and the benefits of local businesses



List of popular RSS feeds
Comments
Post new comment