Major Flaws Uncovered in Study Claiming Wal-Mart Has Not Harmed Small Business

Published December 2008
Picture 2.png

"We can firmly conclude that there is no evidence that Wal-Mart hashad a significant impact on the overall size, growth, or profitabilityof the U.S. small business sector," asserts a new study published inthe October issue of the academic journal Economic Inquiry. Theauthors of "Has Wal-Mart Buried Mom and Pop?" are Dr. Russell Sobel,chair of Entrepreneurial Studies at West Virginia University, andAndrea Dean, a Kendrick Fellow in WVU's Economics Department.

The study's sensational findings have attracted significantlocal and national media attention, including featured interviews withDr. Sobel in U.S. News & World Report and on Fox television, and blog articles on the web sites of Business Week and the Wall Street Journal. A shorter version of the study ran as the cover story in Regulation, the quarterly magazine of the Cato Institute.

Wal-Mart has also leaped on the study, producing a fact sheetthat highlights key findings and quotes from the study. The fact sheetis being distributed in communities where the company is proposing newsupercenters.

A close inspection of the study by the Institute for LocalSelf-Reliance, however, found fatal flaws. Most remarkable, the study'sauthors apparently lack an understanding of the definitions used by theU.S. Census Bureau and are in fact using the wrong dataset...

Download
Major Flaws Uncovered in Study Claiming Wal-Mart Has Not Harmed Small Business

Comments

The New Rules Project exists to encourage policies that will increase the political and economic power of citizens and communities. Newrules.org will only approve comments that are relevant and, in our judgment, add a valuable contribution to the topic. We may edit comments to bring out key points. Abusive comments will not be tolerated.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.